(REUTERS) – Tour de France champion Chris Froome said yesterday that he had escaped unhurt while having his bike written off by an impatient car driver in a hit-and-run incident.The 31-year-old three-time winner of the world’s biggest bike race, tweeted a picture of the twisted remains of his “totalled” training bike, saying he had been deliberately knocked off by the driver.The Team Sky rider said he was “okay” after the incident that happened during a training ride near his home in the south of France.Sky News reported that it understood Froome would be reporting the incident to police.“Just got rammed on purpose by an impatient driver, who followed me onto the pavement! Thankfully I’m okay. Bike totalled. Driver kept going!”, the Team Sky rider wrote, adding an emoji of hands clasped in prayer.Team Sky said the Monaco-based Froome had continued his training session after returning home to get a spare bike.Froome is training for June’s Criterium du Dauphine, his familiar warm-up event before the Tour de France between July 1 and 23. He is favourite to win the event for a third successive year.The incident was just another reminder of the continued perils faced by professional cyclists on the road during training rides.It occurred less than three weeks since the death of 37-year-old Michele Scarponi, the former Giro d’Italia winner, who was struck by a van while training in Italy.His team, Astana, described the death of Scarponi, a husband and father of two, as a ‘tragedy too big to be written’.
Manchester United Manager, Jose Mourinho, has been accused of defrauding tax authorities in Spain during his time with Real Madrid.The allegations against the Portuguese amount to a sum of Â£2.9 million, according to Spanish publication El Pais.A number of high-profile football stars have been accused of tax avoidance in recent months, with Cristiano Ronaldo the most recent example.The 32-year-old Real Madrid player has denied evading tax of Â£13m between 2011 and 2014, and the club subsequently issued a statement claiming it has “full confidence” in Ronaldo.However, reports have since suggested that Ronaldo is “upset” at his treatment, and is set to leave Real. Ironically, a return to United, where he would reunite with Mourinho, has been mooted.Mourinho spent three seasons in charge at the Santiago Bernabeu between 2010 and 2013 before returning to England to take in a second spell with Chelsea.He inherited the managerial reins at Old Trafford in the summer of 2016 and led United to three trophies during his debut campaign. Lionel Messi, of Barcelona, was also accused of tax fraud to the value of Â£3.5m earlier this year, and was sentenced to 21 months in prison, though he is unlikely to face any jail time.Meanwhile, Ronaldo’s woes deepened yesterday when the star striker who reportedly wants to quit Real Madrid was summoned to appear before a judge investigating tax fraud.Ronaldo, 32, was summoned to appear in a Madrid court on July 31 to answer four counts of tax evasion of 14.7 million euro ($16.5m).Unhappy Ronaldo, the four-time world player of the year, has left his future at the Spanish giants in doubt and has been linked to United and other top clubs after angrily announcing last week that his “conscience is clear.”According to media reports Ronaldo is unsettled at Real Madrid because he believes the European champions did not back him as fully as he had hoped in his dispute with the taxman.And he has also complained on multiple occasions in the past about Real supporters, who have resorted at times to jeering and booing his performance on the pitch.However club President Florentino Perez disclosed that no offers had been received by Real to tempt Ronaldo away and the club was determined to keep him.“Ronaldo is a Real player and will continue to be so as far as we are concerned,” Perez told Marca sports daily yesterday. “No offer has been received for him.”Share this:FacebookRedditTwitterPrintPinterestEmailWhatsAppSkypeLinkedInTumblrPocketTelegram
The report issued Wednesday by the NCAA Board of Governors, based on recommendations from the organization’s working group on student name, image and likeness (NIL) issues, weighed in at 31 pages. Even if you don’t print out the PDF file, that feels like a lot of paper.It’s a lot of information on a complicated issue, so it should not be a surprise that it wasn’t easily digestible to the American sports fan. There were many misconceptions flying in the hours after NCAA president Mark Emmert, Big East commissioner Val Ackerman and Ohio State athletic director Gene Smith did a thorough job explaining the plan — and potential obstacles — for college athletes soon to accept payments for endorsements, social media activity, personal appearances and businesses they create. MORE: These NCAA scandals would’ve been legal under new NIL rulesAs always, we are here to help separate truth from myth, with examples culled from listening to various sports talk programs and reading Twitter:1. Ninety percent of college teams will no longer be relevant.MOSTLY WRONG. This largely depends on the sport in question — and also depends on one’s definition of relevance. The Cincinnati Bearcats and Memphis Tigers begin each season with zero chance to reach the College Football Playoff, but they staged two classic matchups last November that determined which would be American Athletic Conference champion. The crowds of the two games averaged out to 34,740. The people who attended seemed to be entertained.That they didn’t matter relative to the national championship is the fault of the College Football Playoff, which has been in place since 2014. It has served to concentrate the power in the game to a few select schools, most notably Alabama, Clemson and Ohio State. Name, image and likeness rights were not at all a factor in this.In NCAA basketball, the fact either Duke or Kentucky rang up every single No. 1 recruiting class from 2009 to 2018 didn’t prevent Villanova and Connecticut from winning two NCAA titles each. The Devils and Wildcats were annually significant, with Duke winning it all in 2010 and 2015, and Kentucky in 2012, but there was plenty of room for such programs as Butler, Wichita State and Loyola to reach the Final Four, and for Dayton to position itself to receiver a No. 1 NCAA Tournament seed.There is no evidence or logic that dictates the advent of NIL deals for college athletes will disrupt that uncommon competitive balance.2. Schools will form marketing departments to make deals for their athletes.WRONG. Schools will be prohibited from involvement in arranging marketing opportunities for their athletes. And, trust me, that’s exactly as they want it. Because they do not want to cross the line between student/athlete and employee. They do not want their athletes to be considered professional. And they do not want the Title IX headaches that would be massive if, as one can surmise based on attendance and television revenues for the various sports, athletes in men’s basketball and football receive an oversized portion of whatever financial opportunities develop.3. Schools will recruit by promising to arrange appearance fees.WRONG. As discussed, the schools will not be involved in arranging NIL opportunities for students. And, as was made clear by Ackerman, boosters will not be permitted to be involved in the recruiting process by offering such deals in advance of enrollment.Now, certainly a head coach could go into a home visit and say, “Our starting quarterback did very well at autograph signings last autumn, and I could see you reaping the same benefit.” That’s not really different than a coach promising a high school star he’ll have a leg up on making the NFL by signing at State U.But if a booster were to whisper to that same young man that there’d be a car and an appearance contract waiting if he signs — well, that would be an NCAA rules violation. It would be cheating. We have cheating now. This would just put a different spin on it.4. Fair market value is established by what a party is willing to pay, and the NCAA has no business interfering.SORRY, NO. The NCAA is fine with allowing athletes to earn what the market typically pays, but not what some overzealous booster is willing to deliver simply to help State U win or to cozy up to the superstar quarterback.This is no different, clearly, than outlawing no-show jobs. Should athletes be paid for turning on the automatic sprinklers? That garbage was going on so long ago it showed up as a scene in “One on One,” which was released in 1977.If an athlete makes a personal appearance at a car dealership or autograph signing, it need not be juiced by the jock-loving booster sweetening the payday. Fair market value. That’s what people have begged for years, and with great volume since Twitter was invented. Fine. Then that should be the standard.5. Schools in the biggest markets will have a huge advantage.SO WRONG. Since when have big-city schools dominated college athletics? Since 1976, when Tony Dorsett and the Pitt Panthers went 12-0, the city-based college football champions have been: Miami (1983, 1987, 1989, 2001); Washington (1991), Ohio State (2002, 2014), USC (2004) and Texas (2005). That’s nine in 43 years. And, let’s be honest, Columbus and Austin are as much college towns as they are big cities.There isn’t any question that big college brands attract the best players. But those brands are big because the teams have enormous followings that extend to state borders and often beyond. And those followings emanate from less populated places such as Tuscaloosa (a town of 101,000 in the 24th most-populated state) and Clemson (a town of 17,000 in the 23rd most-populated state).In college basketball, Gonzaga is a school of 7,400 in a city of 219,000. And yet its teams are known from coast to coast.Big-city schools actually might have a disadvantage because professional athletes tend to dominate their markets.6. The NCAA is trying to keep college football/basketball video games off the market.RIDICULOUS. When has the NCAA ever been eager to turn down money? If there were a popular video game or games based on college sports, the organization and its member schools would receive income from the enterprise, as would the players. But the sort of arrangements that exist now for NFL players or NBA players to aggregate licensing fees do not exist for college athletes. And creating one is a tricky deal, because the colleges — as mentioned — have no desire to proclaim their athletes to be employees.There’s a logic to that. If a Division I football player is an employee, is one who plays in Division III, also? If a D-I basketball player is an employee, is a Division I field hockey player? If every athlete at a Power 5 program were an employee, that likely would lay off more than half; most of them are engaged in sports that lose significant amounts of money.Video games are not central to the issue of the NCAA’s request for congressional action on NIL rights, but the NCAA’s release on this development made sure to mention it.
With the sixth week of Pro Kabaddi League 2019 Season 7 begins on Saturday, August 24, the 59th match of the series will take place between Dabang Delhi and UP Yoddha. Delhi, the hosting team, will be playing their second match on the consecutive day of the sixth week. All the matches of this week will be played at Thyagraj Sports Stadium. The second match of August 25 will begin at 8.30pm IST.The ongoing Pro Kabaddi League 2019 started on July 20, 2019 and will eventually end on October 19, 2019. The 12 participating teams of this PKL season are Bengal Warriors, Bengaluru Bulls, Dabang Delhi, Gujarat Fortunegiants, Haryana Steelers, Jaipur Pink Panthers, Patna Pirates, Puneri Paltan, Tamil Thalaivas, Telugu Titans, U Mumba and UP Yoddha. What time will Pro Kabaddi League 2019 Dabang Delhi vs UP Yoddha start?This will be the second match of the second day in the sixth week of the Pro Kabaddi League 2019. Being the second match of the day, it is scheduled to be played at 8.30pm IST on August 25, 2019. It is the 59th of PKL 2019 and the Dabang Delhi vs UP Yoddha clash will take place at Thyagraj Sports Stadium in Delhi.Where to watch Pro Kabaddi League 2019 Dabang Delhi vs UP Yoddha on TV?The Dabang Delhi vs UP Yoddha clash can be viewed on the television sets on sports channel Star Sports 1 and Star Sports 1 HD.Where to watch Pro Kabaddi League 2019 Dabang Delhi vs UP Yoddha match on live streaming?The live streaming of the Dabang Delhi vs UP Yoddha, Pro Kabaddi League 2019 will be available on Hotstar. Bengal Warriorsbengaluru bullsdabang delhiDabang Delhi vs UP Yoddha First Published: August 25, 2019, 1:17 PM IST Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox – subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what’s happening in the world around you – in real time.